Cedar Rapids Waterloo Iowa City & Dubuque, IA, October 20, 2026 —

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is arguing in court that it is not legally required to enforce the Animal Welfare Act, a position that contrasts with recent public statements by the agency head promising stepped-up enforcement.

The legal argument is part of a lawsuit filed by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals against the USDA. The ASPCA is challenging the department’s licensing and enforcement practices concerning dog breeders in Iowa. The organization alleges that the agency has followed an informal policy of non-enforcement.

The agency’s position in court and its public statements point to different accounts of its enforcement role. The USDA head has recently promised stepped-up enforcement, while the department is arguing that the law does not legally require it to enforce the Animal Welfare Act. The summary of the dispute does not provide further details about the statements or the legal basis for the agency’s argument.

The lawsuit raises questions about how the USDA handles licensing and enforcement involving the Iowa breeders identified in the case. The allegation of an informal non-enforcement policy is the ASPCA’s claim; the available information does not establish that a court has accepted it as fact.

The information provided does not identify the court, the date the lawsuit was filed, the specific breeders involved, or the precise remedies the ASPCA is seeking. It also does not include the USDA’s response beyond its legal argument or indicate whether the court has ruled. Those details are not available in the summary of the dispute.


Story summarized from the original created by Clark Kauffman on www.kcrg.com, see more information here.

Media gallery

About The Author